AI Lecture Redesign — Case Study

Energy Security Meets Visual Clarity

A real MIT lecture on infrastructure protection, natural disasters, and terrorist threats — redesigned by Arty into a clear, engaging deck. Every word preserved, only the design improved.

📄 6 slides transformed 🎓 MIT OpenCourseWare 🤖 Style: Academic Lecture

Why This Deck Needs a Redesign

This lecture from MIT's "Infrastructure and Energy Technology Challenges" course covers critical topics — energy infrastructure vulnerabilities, international politics, and China's energy strategy. But the original slides present these complex, interconnected ideas as dense walls of bullet-point text, making it hard for students to follow the discussion structure:

Arty's redesign separates each discussion question visually, adds structural cues and icons for quick scanning, and transforms the flat text into a layout students can actually prepare from — all without changing a single word of the professor's content.

Original lecture from MIT OpenCourseWare — 11.165/11.477, Fall 2011, Professor Karen R. Polenske. Used under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
1

Title Slide — Infrastructure Protection, Natural Disasters and Terrorist Threats

The original title slide is plain text on a default template with no visual hook. The redesign introduces a visual metaphor and typographic hierarchy that immediately conveys the gravity and scope of the topic.

Before
Before: Original title slide — plain text on default PowerPoint template
Default template, small text, no visual context for the topic
After
After: Redesigned title slide with visual metaphor and clear typography
Strong visual identity, topic-relevant imagery, clear hierarchy
2

Energy Infrastructure, Natural Disasters and Terrorist Threats

Four complex discussion questions packed into dense bullet points. The redesign separates each question into its own visual block, making it easy for students to identify and prepare each one before class.

Before
Before: Original slide 2 — four dense discussion questions as bullets
Four multi-line questions in small bullet text, hard to parse
After
After: Redesigned slide 2 with visually separated discussion questions
Each question in its own visual space, numbered for discussion flow
3

International Politics

Two broad discussion questions about the energy-politics nexus, presented as flat bullets. The redesign visually separates the questions and adds structural cues so students can see the scope of each topic at a glance.

Before
Before: Original slide 3 — international politics discussion questions
Two broad questions in plain bullets, no visual differentiation
After
After: Redesigned slide 3 with structured international politics questions
Clear question separation, visual context for global scope
4

Decision Making

The original presents two academic citations followed by a reflection question, all in the same visual weight. The redesign highlights the two contrasting viewpoints (US vs China) and frames the discussion question as a distinct call to action.

Before
Before: Original slide 4 — decision making citations and questions
Citations and questions mixed in same visual weight
After
After: Redesigned slide 4 with contrasting viewpoints and clear question
Contrasting viewpoints visually separated, discussion question highlighted
5

China's Search for Energy Security

A copyright-removed slide with only a text reference to an external source. The redesign creates a structured layout that frames the reference clearly and makes the external source actionable for students.

Before
Before: Original slide 5 — copyright placeholder text for China energy data
Plain text copyright placeholder, no visual context
After
After: Redesigned slide 5 with structured reference layout
Visual framing of source reference, clear guidance for students
6

International Conflict or Cooperation?

The closing discussion slide presents four reflection questions in flat bullets. The redesign uses visual structure to separate the framing statement from the questions and emphasizes the central tension — conflict versus cooperation.

Before
Before: Original slide 6 — conflict or cooperation discussion questions
Four questions in flat bullets, no visual emphasis on central tension
After
After: Redesigned slide 6 with structured closing discussion
Central tension highlighted, questions structured for guided discussion

Transform Your Lecture Slides in Minutes

Upload your deck, pick a style, and let Arty handle the rest. Your words stay — the design levels up.

Try Deckly.art Free