AI Lecture Redesign — Case Study
Energy Security Meets Visual Clarity
A real MIT lecture on infrastructure protection, natural disasters, and terrorist threats — redesigned by Arty into a clear, engaging deck. Every word preserved, only the design improved.
📄 6 slides transformed
🎓 MIT OpenCourseWare
🤖 Style: Academic Lecture
Why This Deck Needs a Redesign
This lecture from MIT's "Infrastructure and Energy Technology Challenges" course covers critical topics — energy infrastructure vulnerabilities, international politics, and China's energy strategy. But the original slides present these complex, interconnected ideas as dense walls of bullet-point text, making it hard for students to follow the discussion structure:
- 📝 Long multi-sentence bullet points that compete with the professor's spoken explanation, causing cognitive overload
- 🏷️ Vague topic-label headings ("Decision Making") instead of clear takeaway statements that frame the discussion
- 🔗 Complex relationships between energy policy, security, and international actors are invisible in flat text lists
- 📊 Discussion questions with multiple sub-parts are crammed together, making it hard to prepare each question independently
Arty's redesign separates each discussion question visually, adds structural cues and icons for quick scanning, and transforms the flat text into a layout students can actually prepare from — all without changing a single word of the professor's content.
Before
Default template, small text, no visual context for the topic
After
Strong visual identity, topic-relevant imagery, clear hierarchy
Before
Four multi-line questions in small bullet text, hard to parse
After
Each question in its own visual space, numbered for discussion flow
Before
Two broad questions in plain bullets, no visual differentiation
After
Clear question separation, visual context for global scope
Before
Citations and questions mixed in same visual weight
After
Contrasting viewpoints visually separated, discussion question highlighted
Before
Plain text copyright placeholder, no visual context
After
Visual framing of source reference, clear guidance for students
Before
Four questions in flat bullets, no visual emphasis on central tension
After
Central tension highlighted, questions structured for guided discussion